Compare the2024 Mazda CX-50VS 2023 Lexus RX

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-50. But it costs extra on the RX.

Both the CX-50 and the RX have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.

For its top level performance in IIHS driver and passenger-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, roof strength and head restraint tests, its standard vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention system, its standard vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention system, and its standard headlight’s “Good” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the CX-50 its highest rating: “Top Safety Pick Plus” for 2022, a rating granted to only 128 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The RX has not been fully tested, yet.

There are over 2 times as many Mazda dealers as there are Lexus dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the CX-50’s warranty.

On the EPA test cycle the CX-50 gets better mileage than the RX:

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the CX-50 (except Turbo)’s fuel efficiency. The RX doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Both the CX-50 Turbo and the RX have a standard automatic start/stop engine feature to stop unnecessary fuel waste and pollution at stoplights and heavy traffic. All CX-50 Turbos have a standard disable switch for the system, so a driver can keep the engine from shutting off when the vehicle stops temporarily. The RX 350h/500h doesn’t offer a way to disable start/stop.

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Mazda CX-50 uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended with the 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder engine for maximum performance). The RX 350 requires premium, which can cost on average about 82.8 cents more per gallon.

The CX-50 stops much shorter than the RX:

For better traction, the CX-50 Premium Plus/Turbo’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the RX (245/45R20 vs. 235/60R19).

The CX-50 Premium Plus/Turbo’s tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the RX’s optional 50 series tires.

The CX-50 2.5 Turbo handles at .87 G’s, while the RX 500h F Sport Performance pulls only .80 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

For greater off-road capability the CX-50 has a greater minimum ground clearance than the RX 350 (8.3 vs. 8.1 inches), allowing the CX-50 to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The CX-50 Premium/Turbo’s minimum ground clearance is .4 inch higher than on the RX 350h (8.6 vs. 8.2 inches).

The Mazda CX-50 may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 450 to 850 pounds less than the Lexus RX.

The CX-50 is 6.7 inches shorter than the RX, making the CX-50 easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The CX-50 has .6 inches more front legroom and 2.4 inches more rear legroom than the RX.

The CX-50 has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the RX with its rear seat up (31.4 vs. 29.6 cubic feet). The CX-50 has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the RX with its rear seat folded (56.3 vs. 46.2 cubic feet).

A low lift-over cargo hatch design makes loading and unloading the CX-50 easier. The CX-50’s cargo hatch lift-over height is 28.4 inches, while the RX’s liftover is 31 inches.

The CX-50’s cargo area is larger than the RX’s in almost every dimension:

The CX-50’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the RX’s (2000 vs. 0 pounds).

Consumer Reports rated the CX-50’s headlight performance “Very Good,” a higher rating than the RX’s headlights, which were rated “Fair.”

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Mazda CX-50 and the Lexus RX, based on reliability, safety and performance.